After three days of deliberations, a jury has found the foster mother accused of killing a three-year-old boy in her care guilty of manslaughter, but not guilty of second-degree murder.
FOIP is an absolute disgrace: It is those who cause harm and/or wish to maintain secrecy for wrong-doing who are protected; seldomly the victim to whom policy is purported to serve!
Certainly the dead child no longer needs protection... Instead, he should receive recognition that his life mattered! Thus, who, but the purpotrator of the act is protected? We would not require FOIP if children's rights and freedoms were better protected in the first place!
If "accidentally" killing a child isn't manslaughter, I don't know what is.
ReplyDeleteThey won`t name the foster slob, they want to protect her identity!
ReplyDeleteFOIP is an absolute disgrace: It is those who cause harm and/or wish to maintain secrecy for wrong-doing who are protected; seldomly the victim to whom policy is purported to serve!
ReplyDeleteCertainly the dead child no longer needs protection... Instead, he should receive recognition that his life mattered! Thus, who, but the purpotrator of the act is protected? We would not require FOIP if children's rights and freedoms were better protected in the first place!