JUDGING THE JUDGES 2010: Most judges won't discuss low scores
Note: Of course not...
Exercising their right to remain silent, most Southern Nevada judges refused to discuss why attorneys gave them dismal scores on knowing the law and the facts of cases before them, applying both, and explaining their decisions.
A third of the criteria on which attorneys are asked to rate judges, in the biennial Judicial Evaluation Survey conducted by the Review-Journal, involve knowledge and application of the law and facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment