Legally Kidnapped

Shattering Your Child Welfare Delusions Since 2007


Monday, July 26, 2010

'Groundbreaking' new law will change definition of family

'Groundbreaking' new law will change definition of family

The B.C. government plans revolutionary changes to family law to better reflect the realities of modern society.

5 comments:

  1. I'm going to try and locate this in full context and try to break it down- then compare it to the UNCRC. From what I have seen already I do not like it. I only skimmed across it but I did notice that they want to get away from the court room. Remember this-the courtroom doors are having to be opened now, no more secrecy soon! We have gotten away from being innocent until proven guilty by a court of law and jury of our peers to being guilty from the very beginning on hearsay alone! Then proven by our abusers/accusers and our bias judges who are helped by our too compliant appointed attorneys. I think Katie's attorney may have adopted one of our babies. He and his wife adopted a child at the time Mimi was born. Think about it, he works part time as a juvenile court appointed attorney, he is not long out of law school, a few years. Why wouldn't he and his wife adopt a child that they could also receive a big check every month for, huh? I WILL find out! Mediators are becoming more and more common in the US Juvenile and Family Courts right now, especially where the Termination of Parental Rights are concerned. I told my daughter that no matter what she was not to listen to a mediator and that she was going to fight all the way for her child. SHE should have won that case, instead CPS lied and cheated their way to the end, the Judge lied and cheated. By the time she got her orders finally, on the TPR to MIMI you would not believe the things that were added into it that was not gone over or mentioned in the courtroom. Almost every paragraph has at least one lie in it. This is why we have no jury, this is why we have no criminal court in deprivation cases, no matter what, they are going to keep your child if they take it from you. The mediator will try to talk the parent into signing their rights away voluntarily instead of taking a forced termination. Either way your rights are being terminated. The clincher for them is: no trial and it's so easy for them, you all no how they hate to work and are so damn lazy! If you don't know then go to my blog and you will find out! If the mediator would have talked my daughter into signing her rights away voluntarily to Mimi, the foster/adopt parent may have gone into a contract with Katie to allow her some visitation privileges to Mimi. continued

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm going to try and locate this in full context and try to break it down- then compare it to the UNCRC. From what I have seen already I do not like it. I only skimmed across it but I did notice that they want to get away from the court room. Remember this-the courtroom doors are having to be opened now, no more secrecy soon! We have gotten away from being innocent until proven guilty by a court of law and jury of our peers to being guilty from the very beginning on hearsay alone! Then proven by our abusers/accusers and our bias judges who are helped by our too compliant appointed attorneys.
    Mediators are becoming more and more common in the US Juvenile and Family Courts right now, especially where the Termination of Parental Rights are concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. continued- I told my daughter that no matter what she was not to listen to a mediator and that she was going to fight all the way for her child. SHE should have won that case, instead CPS lied and cheated their way to the end, the Judge lied and cheated. By the time she got her orders finally, on the TPR to MIMI you would not believe the things that were added into it that was not gone over or mentioned in the courtroom. Almost every paragraph has at least one lie in it. This is why we have no jury, this is why we have no criminal court in deprivation cases, no matter what, they are going to keep your child if they take it from you. The mediator will try to talk the parent into signing their rights away voluntarily instead of taking a forced termination. Either way your rights are being terminated. The clincher for them is: no trial and it's so easy for them, you all no how they hate to work and are so damn lazy! If you don't know then go to my blog and you will find out! If the mediator would have talked my daughter into signing her rights away voluntarily to Mimi, the foster/adopt parent may have gone into a contract with Katie to allow her some visitation privileges to Mimi. However, it is not enforceable by law and the new adoptive parent has the final say so over everything, if they decide you don't ever see her again, you don't! More than likely it would never last and your grief prolonged and stronger than before. Katie agreed with me that at least Mimi will know, hopefully one day that her real Mommy did try to get her back and fought for her instead of signing her away! After she see's this court order for the TPR she will probably hate her real mother! OMG, One day I will post it if possible but I don't yet know what is going to happen. something, I hope!

    ReplyDelete
  4. By the way, I know that in the state of GA we have 30 days to appeal (the parents do) what if you don't receive your court order until about 60 days later certified return receipt? Naw, probably say well why didn't you just come pick it up...But really, Katie would not know what to do, most people don't understand how sneaky they are.

    Our Judge, did become president of the NCJFCJ on the 21st and he will soon begin the push for the UNCRC ratification I'm sure!! If anyone wants or needs more info on this subject contact me and I may have it! innerpeace5@att.net I posted the link to the New Presidents press release on my blog parentalrights2.blogspot.com Oh and he looks like a really nice friendly guy too. Well he has sure ran the children through his court room over the years and warehoused them in YDC's and RYDC:S, Regional Mental Hospital, etc., continued

    ReplyDelete
  5. continued-He did that to Katie and her sister for a minor thing for 75 days in a row, waiting for a hearing time in front of him! Katie was 12 years old! He brought up her juvenile history (yes he was her judge them too) and how she didn't take advantage of the services she was offered then either. Why didn't he just SAY "YOUR'E A FAILURE SO GET USE TO IT CAUSE YOU'LL NEVER AMOUNT TO BE ANYBODY IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFETIME AND YOU WILL NEVER HAVE ANY CHILDREN BECAUSE WE WILL TAKE EVERY ONE OF THEM AWAY!"? What services? He never offered her any services unless you call prison, leg irons, handcuffs, sleeping on a bare cold concrete floor, wondering which kid might commit suicide next and crying all night! OMG! How is it that the same judge you were in front of as a juvenile can set your fate for children too? huh? He is so bias! Now he runs our nation of family and juvenile court judges collaborating with every single person who works in the field of children and he sits up there letting Citizens review panel members and others take the fall for him.......it's about Awesome State Power, Money and accountability. Callie

    ReplyDelete

Guess what

It Could Happen To You