America's 'shameful' child abuse problem: 5 theories

Before you click on the link associated with the headline, I wanted to offer a couple theories of my own on this little delima that America finds itself in after being accused of leading the way in child abuse deaths.

1. Gay adoption becoming legal in states like Florida and Illinois has opened up a whole new market of potential adoptive "parents", a product line is required to feed the market demands. FMI see... http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/10/record-number-of-gays-lesbians-applying-to-become-parents-in-south-florida/ Therefore you need to condition the public for more child snatching's by social worker.

2. These people are frauds. FMI see... http://www.LegallyKidnapped.blogspot.com"

3. This study or whatever you wanna call it, was done by biased System Sucks. System Sucks, of course profit off of these kids via contract for services ie. psychological help, legal, foster care and group homes, etc. FMI see... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNTa7BksGkg

Anyway, here is the link.

America's 'shameful' child abuse problem: 5 theories

Especially concerning to me is their # 2.

2. American families stick together even when they shouldn't
The American justice system "mistakenly work[s] to preserve the family unit, even where felony child abuse has occurred," says Randy Burton, a former prosecutor in Texas' Harris County District Attorney's office, as quoted by Your Bellaire News. Yes, say Noel Brinkerhoff and David Wallechinsky at AllGov. "The well-intended, but often tragic emphasis in the United States on keeping families together even if a child may be in danger" could well be part of the problem. Sometimes a child is actually safer if his parents split up, and violence is thus taken out of the equation.

You see, there are respected factors in our communities who actually believe this shit even though it's wrong information. They preach for the destruction of families. They are the ones out there hitting the streets, spreading Child Abuse Propaganda, and demanding that the Child Protective Industry do more to protect children when really they're causing more harm than good by snatching all of the cute little blue eyed blonds from loving families, because they're more marketable instead of actually protecting abused and neglected kids from abuse or neglect.

The phrase "Doing more to protect children" typically means snatching more kids and throwing them into foster care, cutting them off from their families, and bouncing them around in a system that can't take care of the kids it already has. Then after they screw them up in the heads, they sit around crying about not being able to find them a "forever home."  And it's not that they haven't figured out that family preservation services actually work in many cases and is better for the child, they have.  It's just that this is how they make their money.

Update: There was a comment left on this post that I didn't want anybody to miss, so I decided to add it in here.

LK and readers: You should know that the NCCPR has a recent blog on how Mr Petit and ECM injected race into this issue; they also previously blogged about how ECM uses invalid statistics. Until someone actually uses statistics that are actually valid, ECM and Mr Petit should just be ignored. After all he is one of the people who helped bring about the death of Logan Marr in Maine 10 years ago.