A judge attacks my 'one-sided' child protection stories - but it cuts both ways
The judgment that Mr Justice Bellamy has published makes for illuminating reading, and not just for its attack on me, says Christopher Booker.
Pages
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Privacy Policy
- Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site.
- Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet.
- Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy.
1 comments:
This is a PAIN case ,we have had two Judgments from the same individual in a matter of days.
The second case residing in the RCJ, was in relation to naming the Paediatrician,who had diagnosed a Mother with MSBP,without ever meeting the parents or children involved.
A so called professional, that was not adequately qualified to make such an assumption.
Also a free lance journalist wanted to publish certain parts of this family court case.
Verdict, Pediatrician named,and journalist allowed the freedom to publish article,without naming any of the children, or parents involved.
With reference to Christopher Bookers article, in yesterdays Daily Telegraph, the general public have also been gagged as well, no comments allowed for legal reasons.
Freedom of speech in UK, is beyond a joke.
WE ARE BEGINNING TO LIVE IN A DICTATORSHIP.
Post a Comment